When pouring fresh concrete, cast-in-place anchor bolts get embedded right then and there, creating that solid connection needed for brand new buildings where heavy loads and earthquake resistance matter most. For older structures needing upgrades or retrofits, post installed anchors come into play. These can be either mechanical or chemical types that go into already hardened concrete after the fact. They give builders needed flexibility but require careful cleaning of holes and precise installation steps. Cast in place systems handle both pulling forces and sideways stress really well, plus they tolerate movement better during earthquakes. Mechanical post installed anchors work great when only straight pulling force matters, whereas chemical versions hold up surprisingly well even in cracked concrete situations and concrete masonry units too.
The L shape of these bent anchors helps prevent them from pulling out of shallow foundations like those used for street lights. Their design allows them to grip more concrete when facing upward forces and sideways wind pressure. For heavier applications such as machinery supports or connecting steel structures, straight anchors work better when combined with base plates. These spread the weight over larger sections of concrete, which is why construction crews often prefer them for big projects. Threaded rods offer another solution where adjustments matter. They fit nicely into steel columns and framework components. When workers install these rods with small pockets filled with grout, the setup becomes much steadier in places where vibrations are common. Plus, this arrangement handles temperature changes pretty well too, something that matters a lot in factories and other industrial spaces.
Chemical anchors work by using epoxy or hybrid resins to stick threaded rods inside drilled holes. This creates even stress distribution across the anchor points and keeps things working properly even when dealing with cracked concrete or Concrete Masonry Units (CMUs). On the other hand, mechanical anchors depend on expansion forces like wedges, sleeves, or drop-ins. These are generally cheaper options for solid, uncracked concrete but they don't hold up so well in materials that are brittle or have low strength. Tests during earthquakes show that chemical anchors keep about 90% of their strength after repeated stress cycles, while mechanical ones only manage around 60 to 70%. When it comes to CMU walls, particularly those with cavities for wall ties, adhesive anchors stop blocks from splitting apart. Wedge anchors however can cause problems like spalling or breaking out the core material of the blocks, which nobody wants to deal with.
The tensile strength of an anchor bolt basically tells us how much pulling force it can handle before getting permanently bent out of shape. The ASTM F1554 standard sets the rules for these bolts, and Grade 55 stands out because it has a minimum yield strength of around 55,000 psi. What makes this grade special is its ability to bend without breaking, which helps absorb energy during movement. That's why engineers often go for Grade 55 when dealing with things that vibrate or move around, think bridge supports or earthquake connections. On the flip side, Grade 105 offers way more strength against static loads at about 105,000 psi minimum. This makes it great for solid structures like tall building footings or heavy machinery mounts. However, there's a tradeoff here since Grade 105 only stretches about 15%, compared to 21% for Grade 55. So if the application needs some controlled flexibility rather than just brute strength, Grade 55 tends to be the better bet despite its lower overall strength numbers.
| Property | ASTM F1554 Grade 55 | ASTM F1554 Grade 105 |
|---|---|---|
| Yield Strength | 55,000 psi | 105,000 psi |
| Tensile Strength | 75,000–95,000 psi | 125,000–150,000 psi |
| Elongation | 21% min | 15% min |
| Typical Use Case | Dynamic/vibration, seismic | High-static loads |
The shear resistance of an anchor bolt basically tells us how well it can handle sideways forces that push against it from the sides rather than straight on something engineers really care about when dealing with things like strong winds, earthquakes shaking buildings around, or machines vibrating nearby. Now let's talk about edge distance which means simply measuring how far away the middle of our bolt sits from the closest edge of whatever concrete we're anchoring into. According to guidelines from AISC Design Guide 1, if we want our bolts to work properly without losing strength, we need to keep this distance at least seven times bigger than the actual size of the bolt itself. So for instance, if someone installs a bolt that's one inch across, they better leave at least seven whole inches between the bolt and the concrete wall or floor edge. Following these rules helps make sure everything stays stable under stress while avoiding those nasty surprises where concrete cracks unexpectedly right where we least expect it.
What kind of material goes into anchor bolts really makes a difference when it comes to how well they perform over time and how long they last. Carbon steel is pretty affordable and gives good tensile strength for stuff inside buildings where there's no moisture around. But leave those bolts outside or in damp areas without any protection? They start rusting away pretty fast. Hot dip galvanizing changes things up because it bonds zinc to the steel surface at the molecular level, which fights off corrosion pretty well in regular outdoor conditions. Still worth noting though that even this treatment breaks down over time if exposed to acidic soil or harsh chemicals. When we're talking about coastal structures, sewage treatment centers, or factories handling chemicals, stainless steel becomes the go to option. Specifically looking at ASTM standards like A193 B8M or B8 (which covers 316 and 304 grades), these materials stand up against all sorts of corrosive forces including pitting, crevice damage, and stress cracks. Real world tests show these bolts can keep working properly for half a century or more even when constantly battered by seawater.
| Material | Best For | Limitation |
|---|---|---|
| Carbon Steel | Budget projects, dry interiors | Prone to rust without coating |
| Galvanized Steel | Outdoor structures, mild climates | Zinc degrades in acidic soils |
| Stainless Steel | Coastal/chemical exposure | Higher initial cost |
Proper specification avoids galvanic incompatibility (e.g., pairing stainless anchors with carbon steel washers) and mitigates chloride-induced stress corrosion cracking—key considerations for durable, code-compliant connections.
Getting the right ASTM spec matters a lot when it comes to how reliable structures turn out. Take ASTM A307 for instance. These are basically low to medium strength carbon steel bolts meant for everyday stuff, nothing too important really. Most folks won't recommend them for main structural anchoring points because they just aren't built for that kind of stress. Now look at ASTM F1554 which deals with those heavy duty anchor bolts that have been heat treated. Grade 55 gives good balance between flexibility and strength, making it suitable for places where there might be shaking or movement from earthquakes. Grade 105 takes things even further with extra strength needed for solid foundations that need to hold everything together without bending. When working in areas prone to rust and corrosion, engineers often go with ASTM F593 stainless steel bolts made from chromium nickel alloys like Type 304 or 316. These last much longer than regular carbon or galvanized alternatives which tend to break down over time. Before finalizing any design, professionals check mill test reports carefully and make sure all certifications align with what the project actually needs in terms of loads, environment factors, and local building regulations including IBC standards, ACI 318 guidelines, and ASCE 7 requirements. Little details matter too: proper embedment depth, correctly aligned holes, accurate torque settings, and thorough inspections according to AISC DG1 and ACI 355.4 specs all contribute to better results. The National Institute of Standards Technology looked into this and found something alarming. Bridges using bolts that weren't properly specified showed around 30% less fatigue resistance. So remember, following these standards isn't just paperwork it's about keeping buildings safe and standing strong.
EN
